Your search
Results 3 resources
-
This study examined children's conceptions of flags as social conventions and understandings of the symbolic and psychological consequences associated with transgressions toward flags. Seventy-two children, at 6, 8, and 10 years, answered general questions about flags as social conventions and judged flag-burning scenarios in which intentions of agents and consequences for recipients were varied. Flag-burning acts were motivated by symbolic, accidental, or instrumental intentions and occurred in public or private. Children at all ages viewed flags as social conventions (i. e., alterable), and symbolic acts of flag-burning occurring in public locations were judged more negatively than private transgressions. Age differences were found in evaluations of instrumental violations and in justifications used to evaluate flag-burning incidents. Overall, findings suggest that despite age-related increases in understanding of flags as meaningful collective symbols, children at all ages considered transgressions to be important and to have moral consequences (i. e., psychological harm).
-
Accounts of the relationship between flags and the law have focused on a narrow strain of contentions drawn from debates about political expression. This essay seeks to bridge the gap between cultural studies’ insight into nationalism and its symbolics, and the flag’s legal status, to better understand the unique position occupied by national flags. Flag ‘waving’ has become more prevalent in many liberal democracies. In such societies, flags occupy not a religious role, but a quiet and quotidian place in what Billig terms ‘banal nationalism’. As a cipher for the whole, a particular flag’s design is relatively unimportant; what lends it power is a mix of the gravity bestowed by its official designation and the easy commodification lent by a flag’s easy reproducibility and portability. Unlike other state symbols such as the currency, coat of arms and honorifics, the state does not seek to monopolise the flag’s use, let alone define its meaning. An analysis of the laws in several countries governing flag designation, observance and ‘desecration’ reveals that the law accords the flag distinct status yet only equivocal protection. While the state may crave its citizens’ fealty, a flag is not a symbol of some distant governmentality. Rather, it is gifted to ‘the people’ and relies for its relevance on its organic proliferation. As both object and image, people attribute a power to the flag – a power they recognise over themselves and others with whom they share a body politic. A key source of this fetishisation is its official, legal designation. Though it embodies no particular values, a flag is valued, even fetishised, by flag-wavers and flag-burners alike.
Explore
Organization
-
Flag Institute (FI)
(1)
- Flagmaster (1)
Resource type
- Journal Article (3)
Publication year
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 1990 and 1999
(1)
- 1999 (1)
-
Between 1990 and 1999
(1)
-
Between 2000 and 2026
(2)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)
- 2006 (1)
-
Between 2010 and 2019
(1)
- 2010 (1)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)
Resource language
Topic
- Flag desecration
- children and flags (1)
- children and symbols (1)
- Display and use (1)
- fetishisation (1)
- fetishization (1)
- flag burning (2)
- flag laws (1)
- flag regulations (1)
- flag waving (1)
- flags (1)
- flags and the law (1)
- Korea -- Democratic People's Republic (1948-) (1)
- legal designations (1)
- legal protection (1)
- legal status of flags (1)
- national symbols (2)
- nationalism (1)
- power of flags (1)
- status of flags (1)